CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 305×165×40 vs H-300x150x6.5x11

UB 305×165×40 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); H-300x150x6.5x11 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 623 cm³ against 633 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.6%. UB 305×165×40 is the lighter of the two at 40.3 kg/m against 41.4 kg/m, a saving of 2.7% on steel weight. Both are about 304 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 305×165×40
UB
H-300x150x6.5x11
MB & MC
Difference
Mass40.3 kg/m41.4 kg/m-2.7%
Depth303.4 mm304 mm-0.2%
Width165 mm150 mm+10.0%
Web thickness6 mm6.5 mm-7.7%
Flange thickness10.2 mm11 mm-7.3%
Area51.3 cm²52.8 cm²-2.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)8,500 cm⁴8,578 cm⁴-0.9%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)623 cm³633 cm³-1.6%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)560 cm³564 cm³-0.7%
Second moment, minor (Iz)764 cm⁴620 cm⁴+23.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)142 cm³128 cm³+10.9%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.86 cm3.43 cm+12.5%
Torsion constant (It)14.7 cm⁴18.8 cm⁴-21.8%

UB 305×165×40 to BS EN 10365:2017; H-300x150x6.5x11 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-300x150x6.5x11.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, H-300x150x6.5x11 has the larger second moment of area: 8,578 cm⁴ against 8,500 cm⁴, a difference of 0.9%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (15.5 against 15.3 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: UB 305×165×40 has 142 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 128 cm³, 10.9% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 2.7% weight.

In short, H-300x150x6.5x11 is the stronger section and UB 305×165×40 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 305×165×40 has a plastic modulus of 623 cm³ and H-300x150x6.5x11 has 633 cm³, a difference of only 1.6% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

UB 305×165×40 at 40.3 kg/m, against 41.4 kg/m for the other - a saving of 2.7%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-300x150x6.5x11 gives 633 cm³ of plastic modulus and 8,578 cm⁴ of inertia against 623 cm³ and 8,500 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

H-300x150x6.5x11, with a second moment of area of 8,578 cm⁴ against 8,500 cm⁴ (0.9% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

IPE 300 vs UB 305×165×40IPE 300 vs H-300x150x6.5x11UB 305×165×40 vs W 12X26UB 305×127×42 vs H-300x150x6.5x11W 12X26 vs H-300x150x6.5x11
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…