CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 305×127×42 vs H-300x150x6.5x11

UB 305×127×42 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); H-300x150x6.5x11 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. H-300x150x6.5x11 carries more bending: 633 cm³ of plastic modulus against 614 cm³, 3.0% more. They weigh essentially the same, 41.9 kg/m and 41.4 kg/m. Both are about 306 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 305×127×42
UB
H-300x150x6.5x11
MB & MC
Difference
Mass41.9 kg/m41.4 kg/m+1.2%
Depth307.2 mm304 mm+1.1%
Width124.3 mm150 mm-17.1%
Web thickness8 mm6.5 mm+23.1%
Flange thickness12.1 mm11 mm+10.0%
Area53.4 cm²52.8 cm²+1.1%
Second moment, major (Iy)8,200 cm⁴8,578 cm⁴-4.4%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)614 cm³633 cm³-3.0%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)534 cm³564 cm³-5.3%
Second moment, minor (Iz)389 cm⁴620 cm⁴-37.3%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)98.4 cm³128 cm³-23.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)2.7 cm3.43 cm-21.3%
Torsion constant (It)21.1 cm⁴18.8 cm⁴+12.2%

UB 305×127×42 to BS EN 10365:2017; H-300x150x6.5x11 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-300x150x6.5x11.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, H-300x150x6.5x11 has the larger second moment of area: 8,578 cm⁴ against 8,200 cm⁴, a difference of 4.4%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, H-300x150x6.5x11 is the more efficient section: 15.3 against 14.7 cm³ per kg/m, 4.2% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: H-300x150x6.5x11 has 128 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 98.4 cm³, 23.1% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, H-300x150x6.5x11 is the stronger section and H-300x150x6.5x11 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

H-300x150x6.5x11 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 633 cm³ against 614 cm³ - 3.0% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: UB 305×127×42 is 41.9 kg/m and H-300x150x6.5x11 is 41.4 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-300x150x6.5x11 gives 633 cm³ of plastic modulus and 8,578 cm⁴ of inertia against 614 cm³ and 8,200 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

H-300x150x6.5x11, with a second moment of area of 8,578 cm⁴ against 8,200 cm⁴ (4.4% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

IPE 300 vs H-300x150x6.5x11UB 305×165×40 vs H-300x150x6.5x11UB 305×127×42 vs IPE 300UB 305×127×42 vs W 12X26W 12X26 vs H-300x150x6.5x11
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…