CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 305×127×42 vs W 12X26

UB 305×127×42 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 12X26 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 614 cm³ against 609.6 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.7%. W 12X26 is the lighter of the two at 38.7 kg/m against 41.9 kg/m, a saving of 8.3% on steel weight. Both are about 309 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 305×127×42
UB
W 12X26
W
Difference
Mass41.9 kg/m38.7 kg/m+8.3%
Depth307.2 mm309.9 mm-0.9%
Width124.3 mm164.8 mm-24.6%
Web thickness8 mm5.8 mm+37.9%
Flange thickness12.1 mm9.7 mm+24.7%
Area53.4 cm²49.4 cm²+8.1%
Second moment, major (Iy)8,200 cm⁴8,491 cm⁴-3.4%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)614 cm³609.6 cm³+0.7%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)534 cm³547.33 cm³-2.4%
Second moment, minor (Iz)389 cm⁴720.1 cm⁴-46.0%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)98.4 cm³133.88 cm³-26.5%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)2.7 cm3.84 cm-29.7%
Torsion constant (It)21.1 cm⁴12.49 cm⁴+68.9%

UB 305×127×42 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 12X26 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 12X26.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 12X26 has the larger second moment of area: 8,491 cm⁴ against 8,200 cm⁴, a difference of 3.4%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 12X26 is the more efficient section: 15.8 against 14.7 cm³ per kg/m, 7.0% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 12X26 has 133.88 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 98.4 cm³, 26.5% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 8.3% weight.

In short, UB 305×127×42 is the stronger section and W 12X26 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 305×127×42 has a plastic modulus of 614 cm³ and W 12X26 has 609.6 cm³, a difference of only 0.7% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

W 12X26 at 38.7 kg/m, against 41.9 kg/m for the other - a saving of 8.3%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 12X26 gives 609.6 cm³ of plastic modulus and 8,491 cm⁴ of inertia against 614 cm³ and 8,200 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 12X26, with a second moment of area of 8,491 cm⁴ against 8,200 cm⁴ (3.4% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

IPE 300 vs W 12X26UB 305×165×40 vs W 12X26UB 305×127×42 vs IPE 300UB 305×127×42 vs H-300x150x6.5x11W 12X26 vs H-300x150x6.5x11
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…