CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 12X26 vs H-300x150x6.5x11

W 12X26 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-300x150x6.5x11 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. H-300x150x6.5x11 carries more bending: 633 cm³ of plastic modulus against 609.6 cm³, 3.7% more. W 12X26 is the lighter of the two at 38.7 kg/m against 41.4 kg/m, a saving of 6.5% on steel weight. Both are about 307 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 12X26
W
H-300x150x6.5x11
MB & MC
Difference
Mass38.7 kg/m41.4 kg/m-6.5%
Depth309.9 mm304 mm+1.9%
Width164.8 mm150 mm+9.9%
Web thickness5.8 mm6.5 mm-10.8%
Flange thickness9.7 mm11 mm-11.8%
Area49.4 cm²52.8 cm²-6.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)8,491 cm⁴8,578 cm⁴-1.0%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)609.6 cm³633 cm³-3.7%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)547.33 cm³564 cm³-3.0%
Second moment, minor (Iz)720.1 cm⁴620 cm⁴+16.1%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)133.88 cm³128 cm³+4.6%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.84 cm3.43 cm+12.0%
Torsion constant (It)12.49 cm⁴18.8 cm⁴-33.6%

W 12X26 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-300x150x6.5x11 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-300x150x6.5x11.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, H-300x150x6.5x11 has the larger second moment of area: 8,578 cm⁴ against 8,491 cm⁴, a difference of 1.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 12X26 is the more efficient section: 15.8 against 15.3 cm³ per kg/m, 3.0% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 6.5% weight.

In short, H-300x150x6.5x11 is the stronger section and W 12X26 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

H-300x150x6.5x11 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 633 cm³ against 609.6 cm³ - 3.7% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

W 12X26 at 38.7 kg/m, against 41.4 kg/m for the other - a saving of 6.5%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-300x150x6.5x11 gives 633 cm³ of plastic modulus and 8,578 cm⁴ of inertia against 609.6 cm³ and 8,491 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

H-300x150x6.5x11, with a second moment of area of 8,578 cm⁴ against 8,491 cm⁴ (1.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

IPE 300 vs W 12X26IPE 300 vs H-300x150x6.5x11UB 305×165×40 vs W 12X26UB 305×165×40 vs H-300x150x6.5x11UB 305×127×42 vs W 12X26UB 305×127×42 vs H-300x150x6.5x11
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…