CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 610×229×113 vs S 24X80

UB 610×229×113 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); S 24X80 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 3280 cm³ against 3343 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.9%. UB 610×229×113 is the lighter of the two at 113 kg/m against 119.1 kg/m, a saving of 5.1% on steel weight. Both are about 609 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 610×229×113
UB
S 24X80
S
Difference
Mass113 kg/m119.1 kg/m-5.1%
Depth607.6 mm609.6 mm-0.3%
Width228.2 mm177.8 mm+28.3%
Web thickness11.1 mm12.7 mm-12.6%
Flange thickness17.3 mm22.1 mm-21.7%
Area144 cm²151.6 cm²-5.0%
Second moment, major (Iy)87,300 cm⁴87,409 cm⁴-0.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)3,280 cm³3,343 cm³-1.9%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,870 cm³2,867.7 cm³+0.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)3,430 cm⁴1,748 cm⁴+96.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)469 cm³340.85 cm³+37.6%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.88 cm3.4 cm+43.5%
Torsion constant (It)111 cm⁴203.5 cm⁴-45.5%

UB 610×229×113 to BS EN 10365:2017; S 24X80 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to S 24X80.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, S 24X80 has the larger second moment of area: 87,409 cm⁴ against 87,300 cm⁴, a difference of 0.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, UB 610×229×113 is the more efficient section: 29.0 against 28.1 cm³ per kg/m, 3.4% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: UB 610×229×113 has 469 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 340.85 cm³, 37.6% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and S to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 5.1% weight.

In short, S 24X80 is the stronger section and UB 610×229×113 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 610×229×113 has a plastic modulus of 3280 cm³ and S 24X80 has 3343 cm³, a difference of only 1.9% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

UB 610×229×113 at 113 kg/m, against 119.1 kg/m for the other - a saving of 5.1%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: S 24X80 gives 3343 cm³ of plastic modulus and 87,409 cm⁴ of inertia against 3280 cm³ and 87,300 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

S 24X80, with a second moment of area of 87,409 cm⁴ against 87,300 cm⁴ (0.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 610×229×113 vs IPE A 600UB 610×229×113 vs W 24X76UB 610×229×113 vs H-600x200x12x20-118W 24X76 vs S 24X80
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…