CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 610×229×113 vs IPE A 600

UB 610×229×113 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); IPE A 600 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. UB 610×229×113 carries more bending: 3280 cm³ of plastic modulus against 3140 cm³, 4.5% more. IPE A 600 is the lighter of the two at 108 kg/m against 113 kg/m, a saving of 4.6% on steel weight. Both are about 602 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 610×229×113
UB
IPE A 600
IPE
Difference
Mass113 kg/m108 kg/m+4.6%
Depth607.6 mm597 mm+1.8%
Width228.2 mm220 mm+3.7%
Web thickness11.1 mm9.8 mm+13.3%
Flange thickness17.3 mm17.5 mm-1.1%
Area144 cm²137 cm²+5.1%
Second moment, major (Iy)87,300 cm⁴82,900 cm⁴+5.3%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)3,280 cm³3,140 cm³+4.5%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,870 cm³2,780 cm³+3.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)3,430 cm⁴3,120 cm⁴+9.9%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)469 cm³442 cm³+6.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.88 cm4.77 cm+2.3%
Torsion constant (It)111 cm⁴122 cm⁴-9.0%

UB 610×229×113 to BS EN 10365:2017; IPE A 600 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to IPE A 600.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 610×229×113 has the larger second moment of area: 87,300 cm⁴ against 82,900 cm⁴, a difference of 5.3%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (29.0 against 29.1 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and IPE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 4.6% weight.

In short, UB 610×229×113 is the stronger section and IPE A 600 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

UB 610×229×113 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 3280 cm³ against 3140 cm³ - 4.5% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

IPE A 600 at 108 kg/m, against 113 kg/m for the other - a saving of 4.6%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: IPE A 600 gives 3140 cm³ of plastic modulus and 82,900 cm⁴ of inertia against 3280 cm³ and 87,300 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 610×229×113, with a second moment of area of 87,300 cm⁴ against 82,900 cm⁴ (5.3% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 610×229×113 vs W 24X76UB 610×229×113 vs S 24X80UB 610×229×113 vs H-600x200x12x20-118W 24X76 vs IPE A 600
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…