CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 610×229×113 vs W 24X76

UB 610×229×113 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 24X76 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 3280 cm³ against 3277.4 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.1%. They weigh essentially the same, 113 kg/m and 113.1 kg/m. Both are about 607 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 610×229×113
UB
W 24X76
W
Difference
Mass113 kg/m113.1 kg/m-0.1%
Depth607.6 mm607.1 mm+0.1%
Width228.2 mm228.3 mmsame
Web thickness11.1 mm11.2 mm-0.9%
Flange thickness17.3 mm17.3 mmsame
Area144 cm²144.5 cm²-0.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)87,300 cm⁴87,409 cm⁴-0.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)3,280 cm³3,277.4 cm³+0.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,870 cm³2,884.1 cm³-0.5%
Second moment, minor (Iz)3,430 cm⁴3,434 cm⁴-0.1%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)469 cm³468.67 cm³+0.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.88 cm4.88 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)111 cm⁴111.6 cm⁴-0.5%

UB 610×229×113 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 24X76 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 24X76.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 24X76 has the larger second moment of area: 87,409 cm⁴ against 87,300 cm⁴, a difference of 0.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (29.0 against 29.0 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 610×229×113 has a plastic modulus of 3280 cm³ and W 24X76 has 3277.4 cm³, a difference of only 0.1% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 610×229×113 is 113 kg/m and W 24X76 is 113.1 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 24X76 gives 3277.4 cm³ of plastic modulus and 87,409 cm⁴ of inertia against 3280 cm³ and 87,300 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 24X76, with a second moment of area of 87,409 cm⁴ against 87,300 cm⁴ (0.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 610×229×113 vs IPE A 600UB 610×229×113 vs S 24X80UB 610×229×113 vs H-600x200x12x20-118W 24X76 vs IPE A 600W 24X76 vs S 24X80W 24X76 vs H-600x200x12x20-118
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…