Beam Splice Connection Calculator

Design a beam splice - the joint that gives continuity between two in-line beams - to Eurocode 3 (EN 1993-1-8) with SCI P358/P398. Choose how each flange is treated (a full-strength butt weld, or a bolted cover plate) with a bolted web cover plate. The calculator distributes the moment between the flanges and the web by the second-moment-of-area ratio, then verifies the preloaded (HSFG) web bolts (slip resistance and combined bearing from shear plus the bolt-group eccentricity), the flange bolts, the tension flange and cover plate, the web cover plate (shear and bending) and the beam web - each with its utilisation and a clear PASS/FAIL on an interactive 3D model.

Free online calculator with step-by-step working and one-click Excel (.xlsx) and PDF export.

Using this beam splice calculator

What it checks

A beam splice joins two lengths of beam so the connection transmits the moment, shear and any axial force across the joint. This calculator follows EN 1993-1-8 and SCI P358: it distributes the internal forces between the flange and web cover plates, then checks the web bolts for slip and bearing, the flange bolts, the tension flange and its cover plate, the web cover plate in shear and bending, and the beam web itself.

The force distribution is the part that catches people out. The flanges take the moment as a couple, the web takes the shear - but the web bolt group also picks up a moment from the eccentricity between the bolt group centroid and the splice centreline, and that eccentricity moment is often what sizes the web bolts.

Slip resistance governs a preloaded splice

Running the tool on its defaults - a 533 x 210 S355 beam, welded top flange and bolted bottom flange, M20 grade 8.8 preloaded bolts, mu = 0.5 - gives:

Web bolts, slip resistance
36.69 / 54.88 kN, utilisation 0.669 - GOVERNS
Web bolts, bearing
utilisation 0.264
Web cover plate, bending
28.78 / 137.46 kNm, utilisation 0.209
Tension flange
156.0 / 909.8 kN, utilisation 0.172
Web cover plate, shear
100 / 852.1 kN, utilisation 0.117
Beam web, shear
100 / 947.0 kN, utilisation 0.106
Flange bolts
19.5 / 237.6 kN, utilisation 0.082
Flange force from moment
156.0 kN
Web bolt eccentricity moment
9.50 kNm

Slip governs at 0.669, well clear of everything else - and it governs at less than half the bearing utilisation of the same bolts. That is the defining characteristic of a preloaded splice: the connection is designed not to move, and the friction grip runs out long before the bolts run out of shear or bearing capacity.

The practical consequence is that slip resistance depends on the friction surface, not on bolt strength. A surface treatment that delivers mu = 0.5 rather than 0.3 buys 67 per cent more capacity on the governing check, whereas upgrading the bolt grade changes nothing at all.

The eccentricity moment on the web bolts

The web bolt group sits to one side of the splice centreline, so the shear passing through it also applies a moment equal to the shear times that lever arm - 9.50 kNm in the example above. That moment is resisted by the bolt group as a polar distribution, adding a component to the outermost bolts that the vertical shear alone would not produce.

The tool reports both the direct shear and the eccentricity contribution, and the polar second moment of the bolt group that resolves them. Making the web bolt group taller reduces the force on each bolt from the moment, which is usually a better move than adding a column of bolts further from the centreline.

Formula reference

Slip resistance, preloaded
Fs,Rd=ksnμγM3Fp,CF_{s,Rd} = \dfrac{k_s\,n\,\mu}{\gamma_{M3}}\,F_{p,C}
Preload force
Fp,C=0.7fubAsF_{p,C} = 0.7\,f_{ub}\,A_s
Flange force from moment
Ff=MEdhtfF_f = \dfrac{M_{Ed}}{h - t_f}
Web bolt eccentricity moment
Mecc=VEdeM_{ecc} = V_{Ed}\,e
Polar second moment of the bolt group
Ip=(xi2+yi2)I_p = \sum (x_i^{2} + y_i^{2})
Bolt force from moment
FM,i=MriIpF_{M,i} = \dfrac{M\,r_i}{I_p}
Cover plate bending
MRd=WplfyγM0M_{Rd} = \dfrac{W_{pl}\,f_y}{\gamma_{M0}}

Assumptions and limits

Slip resistance assumes the declared friction surface class is actually achieved on site. Class A needs blasted, uncontaminated faying surfaces - paint, primer, oil or mill scale void the assumption entirely, and no calculation recovers it. The preload itself depends on controlled tightening, so the specification and the inspection regime are part of the design, not an afterthought.

The tool checks the splice components. It does not check the beam as a member either side of the joint, and it assumes the splice is located where the design forces you enter actually occur - placing a splice near a point of contraflexure is a design decision that changes the forces, not something the tool optimises for you.

Static persistent design situation. Fatigue - which is a common reason to preload in the first place - fire and seismic detailing are outside the scope.

FAQ

Because a preloaded connection is designed not to move at all. Slip resistance comes from friction between the plates, which is much lower than the bolt shear capacity - 0.669 utilisation against 0.264 in bearing for the same bolts in the example above.

Improve the friction surface or add bolts. Slip resistance is k_s n mu F_p,C, so it scales with the friction coefficient and the number of bolts, not with bolt grade. Going from mu = 0.3 to 0.5 gains 67 per cent; a higher grade bolt gains nothing on this check.

The web bolt group is offset from the splice centreline, so the shear through it applies a moment equal to shear times that offset - 9.50 kNm in the example. It adds a polar-distributed force component to the outer bolts.

Not always. A bearing-type splice is acceptable where slip is tolerable. Preload is needed where movement would be unacceptable, under load reversal, or for fatigue. It costs more in installation and inspection, so it should be a deliberate choice.

Wherever the design forces are lowest - usually away from the point of maximum moment. That is a framing decision rather than a calculation: the tool checks the splice against the forces you give it, and moving the splice changes those forces.

Yes. The engine is validated against SCI P358 worked examples, and the regression test covering these resistances runs as part of the repository build checks.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…